Mark Farrell says SF’s oversight of Recology is trash. He wants to change that

San Francisco’s garbage company is trashy in more ways than one. One mayoral candidate says he has a solution.&nbsp;



Former Supervisor and interim Mayor Mark Farrell wants to put the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission in charge of Recology, the city’s scandal-plagued trash hauler.&nbsp;



The problem is twofold, Farrell said: San Franciscans are fed up with garbage-filled streets, and Recology’s officers have been indicted for juicing their bills, overcharging city residents $94.5 million that they will repay in a settlement with the city.



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="8192" height="5464" src="https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/20240910-garbagepolicy-es-20.jpg?w=2500" alt="A row of white garbage trucks with green and blue stripes is parked in a lot, with hills in the background." class="wp-image-310728" srcset="https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/20240910-garbagepolicy-es-20.jpg 8192w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/20240910-garbagepolicy-es-20.jpg?resize=300,200 300w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/20240910-garbagepolicy-es-20.jpg?resize=768,512 768w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/20240910-garbagepolicy-es-20.jpg?resize=2500,1667 2500w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/20240910-garbagepolicy-es-20.jpg?resize=1536,1025 1536w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/20240910-garbagepolicy-es-20.jpg?resize=2048,1366 2048w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 8192px) 100vw, 8192px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">San Francisco&#8217;s garbage company, Recology, has a history of bribing city officials.</figcaption></figure>



Farrell argued that putting the company under the commission&#8217;s purview, which has citizen groups that oversee the city’s other utility services, would help solve both problems.



“The unfortunate reality is Mayor Breed has failed in the cleanliness of our streets,” Farrell told The Standard. “There&#8217;s no place to put our trash in commercial corridors and our neighborhoods. Trash cans have been systematically removed from our city while our streets have gotten dirtier.”



But Farrell’s plan isn’t a done deal, even if he wins.&nbsp;



Recology’s century-old contract is up for renewal in October. And since its oversight was recently transferred to a ratepayer board <a href="https://develop.sfstandard.com/2022/05/06/recology-backtracks-on-fighting-garbage-rate-reform-in-sf-will-now-back-june-ballot-measure/">after the passage of Proposition F</a> in 2022, a supermajority vote of the Board of Supervisors may be required to tweak some city rules governing our garbage.



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="3000" height="2000" src="https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/20240723_farrellvisitspaintedladies_-04891.jpg?w=2500" alt="A man in a dark suit jacket gestures with his hand. He appears to be speaking. The background features a chandelier and blurred people." class="wp-image-294762" srcset="https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/20240723_farrellvisitspaintedladies_-04891.jpg 3000w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/20240723_farrellvisitspaintedladies_-04891.jpg?resize=300,200 300w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/20240723_farrellvisitspaintedladies_-04891.jpg?resize=768,512 768w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/20240723_farrellvisitspaintedladies_-04891.jpg?resize=2500,1667 2500w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/20240723_farrellvisitspaintedladies_-04891.jpg?resize=1536,1024 1536w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/20240723_farrellvisitspaintedladies_-04891.jpg?resize=2048,1365 2048w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 3000px) 100vw, 3000px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Mark Farrell says that putting the company under the city&#8217;s purview will save residents money.</figcaption></figure>



Slogging through that process would be worth it, though, because the move will save money for residents, Farrell claims. If the SFPUC oversaw Recology, the agency could bundle garbage rates with other utility costs, which other cities like Seattle already do.



Recology’s relationship with San Francisco has been in flux since the 2020 federal indictment of former Public Works Director Mohammed Nuru, who was found guilty of taking bribes from multiple parties, including Recology officers.&nbsp;



Former Recology Community Relations Manager Paul Giusti arranged more than $1 million in bribes for Nuru. Giusti cooperated with the investigation, <a href="https://develop.sfstandard.com/2023/12/14/san-francisco-corruption-paul-giusti-sandra-zuniga-sentencing/">sparing him prison time</a>. John Porter, his supervisor, <a href="https://develop.sfstandard.com/2023/09/21/san-francisco-corruption-recology-executive-sentenced-nuru-bribery-scandal/">was sentenced to six months of house arrest</a> for signing off on those payments.



In 2021, Recology settled a lawsuit filed by San Francisco and agreed to repay ratepayers at least $94.5 million in overcharges.



In a statement, Breed&#8217;s campaign took aim at Farrell for taking a $5,000 donation from a Recology PAC in 2018. Just a week later, <a href="https://develop.sfstandard.com/2024/07/01/mark-farrell-campaign-money-san-francisco-restaurants-bars/">Farrell nominated Giusti, who was indicted by the FBI</a>, to a city commission. 



 &#8220;Mark Farrell did nothing to address Recology when he was in office as supervisor or temporary mayor. He doesn’t get to have a plan now, he has a record,&#8221; said Breed campaign spokesperson Joe Arellano. &#8220;San Francisco’s streets aren’t dirty, Mark Farrell is.&#8221;



<div class="wp-block-sf-standard-related-posts-container">
<div class="wp-block-sf-standard-related-post"></div>
</div>



Since Recology’s rates were moved <a href="https://www.spur.org/voter-guide/2022-06/sf-prop-f-refuse-rate-reform">to a new oversight model</a> in 2022, the Refuse Rate Board <a href="https://develop.sfstandard.com/2023/03/10/scandal-plagued-recology-wants-you-to-pay-more-for-garbage-removal/">has approved rate increases</a> of only 1.33% in 2024 and 2.55% in 2025, which is 36% lower than Recology’s proposed rate increases and will result in $8.7 million in ratepayer savings over two years, according to the mayor’s ffice.



“Following the disturbing revelations of criminal conduct by certain Recology executives, the City acted swiftly and decisively to provide cooperation to law enforcement which resulted in successful convictions and also to impose significant new controls, oversight and transparency on the city’s contracting practices for refuse collection and refuse rate-setting,” the mayor’s office said in a statement.



Farrell said it’s not enough — the public needs more transparency into Recology.



Despite the scandal, perhaps more pressing on voters’ minds is Recology’s main function: picking up the trash. San Francisco’s streets are infamously dirty, an oft-cited problem in the background of the city’s twin ills of crime and homelessness.&nbsp;



In response to a call-out for questions from The Standard, one reader, Gina G., wrote, “No one is picking up the garbage and the amount of trash everywhere is unprecedented. Even the public trash can near my building has been missing its door for a year, and reports to 311 go unanswered. What is your plan to fix this?”



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="3000" height="2001" src="https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/BlackChurches09102023-951-1.jpg?w=2500" alt="A wall with colorful graffiti art is in the background, while trash and bags of garbage are scattered on the sidewalk in front. A parking meter is also visible." class="wp-image-205243" srcset="https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/BlackChurches09102023-951-1.jpg 3000w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/BlackChurches09102023-951-1.jpg?resize=300,200 300w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/BlackChurches09102023-951-1.jpg?resize=768,512 768w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/BlackChurches09102023-951-1.jpg?resize=2500,1668 2500w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/BlackChurches09102023-951-1.jpg?resize=1536,1025 1536w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/BlackChurches09102023-951-1.jpg?resize=2048,1366 2048w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 3000px) 100vw, 3000px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">San Francisco’s streets are infamously dirty.</figcaption></figure>



Farrell’s plan for SFPUC oversight includes pushing for more public trash cans, increasing the frequency of trash pickup, and rolling out a reusable container program to reduce single-use plastic waste. Similar programs are underway in London, Portland, <a href="https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Articles/2024/04/08/reuse-movement">and in some sports stadiums</a>.&nbsp;



Russel Long, a senior advisor with environmental nonprofit Friends of the Earth U.S., said Farrell’s plan to help San Francisco ensure Recology plays by the rules is not just good government; it’s also important to ensure it reaches its environmental goals.&nbsp;



“Recology has had a terrible lack of oversight,” Long said. “Elected officials were their appointed regulators. Obviously, the level of corruption discovered in Recology has been staggering. We need to clean it up.”



Long said the reusable container proposal could join other memorable city policies to clean up the streets, some of which he played a role in, too. In the 1990s h...

The Refuse Rate Board oversees the refuse rate setting process in San Francisco. It evaluates recommendations from the Refuse Rate Administrator and makes decisions on rate adjustments. The board ensures transparency and accountability in refuse collection and disposal pricing.

Refuse Rate Board

Carmen Chu

Dennis Herrera

Refuse Rate Board Commissioner 3

Asian Art Museum

Office of the City Administrator

Adult Probation Department

Airport

Arts Commission

Office of the Assessor-Recorder

Board of Appeals

Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

Office of the City Attorney

Department of Children, Youth and Their Families

Controller's Office

Planning Department

Civil Service Commission

District Attorney's Office

Department of Building Inspection

Department of Early Childhood

Department of Emergency Management

Department of Police Accountability

Department of Public Health

Department of Public Works

Office of Economic and Workforce Development

Environment Department

Ethics Commission

Fine Arts Museums

Fire Department

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing

Human Rights Commission

Department of Human Resources

Human Services Agency

Health Service System

Juvenile Probation Department

Public Library

Municipal Transportation Agency

Office of the Mayor

Public Defender's Office

Police Department

Port

Public Utilities Commission

Recreation and Park Department

Department of Elections

Retirement System

Rent Board

Sheriff's Department Office of Inspector General

Sheriff's Department

Department of Technology

Office of the Treasurer & Tax Collector

War Memorial

Department on the Status of Women

General City Responsibilities

General Administration & Finance

Culture & Recreation

Community Health

Human Welfare & Neighborhood Development

Public Works, Transportation & Commerce

Public Protection

SF Civil Grand Jury

The Abatement Appeals Board provides a final review process for City permitting decisions. It ensures fair and efficient adjudication of permit-related disputes before an impartial panel. The board holds authority to make binding decisions on appeals concerning notices of abatement.

Abatement Appeals Board

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 1

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 2

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 3

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 4

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 5

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 6

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 7

The Access Appeals Commission provides final reviews for a wide range of City permitting decisions. It ensures an efficient, fair, and expeditious permit issuance process through an impartial panel. The commission holds authority to make binding decisions on appeals related to City permits.

Access Appeals Commission

Access Appeals Commission Commissioner 1

Access Appeals Commission Commissioner 2

Access Appeals Commission Commissioner 3

Access Appeals Commission Commissioner 4

Access Appeals Commission Commissioner 5

The Adult Day Health Care Planning Council advises on the development and improvement of adult day health care services. It provides expertise in healthcare planning, policy recommendations, and program evaluation. Key responsibilities include assessing community needs and advising on service delivery enhancements.

Adult Day Health Care Planning Council

Adult Probation Department supervises individuals on probation and facilitates their reintegration into the community. It provides reentry and rehabilitative services, including victim restitution and financial assistance for crime victims. The department values public safety, offender rehabilitation, and community partnerships.

Cristel Tullock

The Advisory Committee of Street Artists and Crafts Examiners evaluates arts and crafts applicants and monitors program compliance. It conducts studio visits and public screenings to ensure adherence to established criteria. Members also revise program criteria and undertake additional tasks as needed.

Advisory Committee of Street Artists and Crafts Examiners

The Advisory Council on Human Rights advises on anti-discrimination laws and racial equity initiatives. It provides expertise on reparations and public policy impacts on Black communities. It guides efforts to establish partnerships with Historically Black Colleges and Universities in San Francisco.

Advisory Council on Human Rights

San Francisco Airport manages air traffic operations and ensures safe aircraft movement. It provides parking facilities and maintains airport infrastructure to accommodate travelers and staff. The department oversees ground transportation and coordinates with airlines for efficient passenger services.

Mike Nakornkhet

The Airport Commission oversees policy and strategic planning for San Francisco International Airport. It makes key decisions on airport development projects and financial management. It ensures compliance with regulations and collaborates on initiatives like terminal naming.

Airport Commission

Airport Commission Commissioner 1

Malcolm Yeung

Jose F. Almanza

Mark Buell

Susan Leal

Airport Director

Animal Care and Control Department manages animal sheltering, adoption, and emergency response services. It enforces animal-related laws and regulations, ensuring the humane treatment and safety of animals. The department also provides public education on responsible pet ownership and animal welfare.

Animal Care and Control Department

Virginia Donohue

Animal Care and Control Department, Director

The San Francisco Arts Commission oversees the integration of arts into city life and ensures public access to cultural experiences. It makes decisions on public art programs and allocates grants to support local artists and performances. The commission actively shapes policies affecting the arts ecosystem in San Francisco.

Arts Commission Commissioner 1

Arts Commission Commissioner 2

Arts Commission Commissioner 3

Arts Commission Commissioner 4

Debra Walker

Suzanne Ferras

Jessica Rothschild

Seth Brenzel

JD Beltran

Marcus Shelby

J Riccardo Benavides

Nabiel Musleh

Charles (Chuck) Collins

Lydia So

Arts Commission Commissioner 15

San Francisco Arts Commission invests in a vibrant arts community and shapes cultural policy. It enlivens the urban environment through public art programs and supports diverse artistic expressions. The commission facilitates meetings and discussions to engage the community in cultural development.

Ralph Remington

Arts Commission, Director of Cultural Affairs

The Asian Art Commission determines policy and administers the Asian Art Museum of San Francisco. It oversees museum operations and collaborates with the Asian Art Museum Foundation on fundraising efforts. Commissioners ensure the museum's strategic direction and financial sustainability.

Asian Art Commission

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 1

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 2

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 3

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 4

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 5

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 6

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 7

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 8

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 9

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 10

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 11

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 12

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 13

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 14

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 15

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 16

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 17

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 18

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 19

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 20

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 21

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 22

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 23

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 24

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 25

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 26

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 27

Asian Art Museum showcases Asian art and culture through exhibitions and educational programs. It offers diverse collections and hosts special events to engage the community. The museum fosters cultural appreciation and understanding by providing access to its extensive art collections.

Dr. Soyoung Lee

Asian Art Museum, Director

The Assessment Appeals Board #1 hears property tax assessment appeals in San Francisco. It evaluates evidence presented by taxpayers and the Assessor to determine property values. The Board has the authority to make final decisions on assessments regardless of property type or value.

Assessment Appeals Board #1

Assessment Appeals Board #1 Commissioner 1

Assessment Appeals Board #1 Commissioner 2

Richard Lee

Stephen Wasserman

Adena Gilbert

Paul Bellar

Quirina Mitchell

Hilary Winslow

The Assessment Appeals Board #2 adjudicates property tax assessment appeals for San Francisco taxpayers. It evaluates evidence presented by taxpayers and the Assessor to determine accurate property values. The Board exercises authority to render final decisions on residential properties and specific real estate assessments.

Assessment Appeals Board #2

Assessment Appeals Board #2 Commissioner 1

Assessment Appeals Board #2 Commissioner 2

Assessment Appeals Board #2 Commissioner 3

Claire Ervin Lee

Louisa Mendoza

Joyce Lewis

Nicholas Goldman

Michelle Domingo

The Assessment Appeals Board #3 provides a platform for San Francisco taxpayers to contest property tax assessments. It conducts hearings where evidence from both taxpayers and the Assessor is evaluated. The Board makes binding decisions on property assessments based on presented evidence.

Assessment Appeals Board #3

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 1

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 2

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 3

Marc Dickow

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 5

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 6

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 7

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 8

Assesses property, applies exemptions, collects transfer taxes, and records official documents.

Assessor-Recorder

Joaquín Torres

The Ballot Simplification Committee ensures voter materials are clear and understandable. It reviews and revises ballot language to accurately reflect propositions and measures. The committee advises on simplifying complex legal and technical terms for voter comprehension.

Ballot Simplification Committee

The Bayview Hunters Point Citizens Advisory Committee provides policy advice on planning and land use matters in Zone 2 of Bayview Hunter's Point. It offers expertise in land use policies, zoning issues, and urban development. The committee advises the Board of Supervisors, City Boards, and commissions on relevant projects and initiatives.

Bayview Hunters Point Citizens Advisory Committee

The Behavioral Health Commission advises on mental health policy implementation and quality service delivery. It reviews and advocates for effective mental health services, ensuring policies meet community needs. It educates stakeholders to integrate mental health considerations into broader health strategies.

Behavioral Health Commission

The Bicycle Advisory Committee advises on making bicycling safer and more accessible in San Francisco. It provides recommendations to city agencies to address traffic violence and climate change. The committee advocates for cyclists and addresses biking-related complaints.

Bicycle Advisory Committee

The Board of Appeals provides final review for a wide range of City permitting decisions. It ensures an efficient and fair permit issuance process through an impartial panel. The Board exercises authority to make binding decisions on appeals.

Jefferson Robert Eppler

John Trasviña

Jose Lopez

Rick Swig

Board of Appeals Commissioner 5

Board of Appeals conducts final reviews of City permitting decisions through an impartial panel. It ensures an efficient and fair permit issuance process. The department operates under rules established by the City Charter of 1932.

Julie Rosenberg