SF supervisors walk back red state boycott

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Tuesday repealed a law that compels City Hall to boycott a majority of U.S. states. And the supervisors read the riot act to a nonprofit service contractor accused of union-busting.



They also opened the door to renewed debate over the use of robots by police and questioned how the city would cooperate with the deployment of state law enforcement entities to combat the Tenderloin drug crisis. 



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-best-intentions-no-results-boycott-law-repealed">Best Intentions, No Results: Boycott Law Repealed</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="2500" height="1668" src="https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-2500x1668.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-132366" srcset="https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-2500x1668.jpg 2500w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-300x200.jpg 300w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-768x512.jpg 768w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-1536x1025.jpg 1536w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-2048x1366.jpg 2048w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-650x434.jpg 650w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-370x247.jpg 370w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-800x534.jpg 800w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-450x300.jpg 450w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-20x13.jpg 20w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-185x123.jpg 185w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-740x494.jpg 740w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-400x267.jpg 400w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-1600x1067.jpg 1600w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-225x150.jpg 225w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-900x600.jpg 900w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/022723BOSRoundup-67-72x48.jpg 72w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 2500px) 100vw, 2500px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Supervisor Shamann Walton attends a Board of Supervisors meeting in February. | Michaela Vatcheva for The Standard</figcaption></figure>



Supervisors voted 7-4 to repeal a law prohibiting agencies from doing business with companies based in states with laws that discriminate against LGBTQ+ people, restrict access to abortion or make it difficult to vote. Supervisors Shamann Walton, Myrna Melgar, Connie Chan and Dean Preston dissented.&nbsp;



Authored by then-Supervisor Scott Wiener, in 2016, the law, Section 12X of the Administrative Code, was meant to motivate other progressive cities to leverage their economic power against states that were enacting discriminatory laws, but it never gained traction, despite now applying to 30 states.&nbsp;



Meanwhile, the economic effects of Covid and other issues highlighted the often- prohibitive costs that the law was causing the city to incur, including <a href="https://develop.sfstandard.com/politics/san-francisco-most-controversial-bathroom-lgbtq-rights/">a recent controversy</a> over million-dollar-plus estimates for park restrooms.&nbsp;



Board members debated the repeal before the vote, with dissenting members arguing that keeping a reformed version of the law was preferable to repeal.&nbsp;



“We can’t make these changes without a plan,” Walton told his colleagues before the vote, fearing that repeal would create “unintended consequences” for local small business contractors.&nbsp;



“I do think that the intent behind 12X was good and correct, but [&#8230;] it’s not achieving the goal we want to achieve,” Supervisor Rafael Mandelman, chief sponsor of the repeal, told the board. “We have incredible needs for vulnerable populations right here in San Francisco. [&#8230;] The better we can make San Francisco government work for our folks, the more good we can do.”&nbsp;



Supervisor Hillary Ronen, one of the most progressive members of the board, also supported the repeal.



“What bothers me about 12X is that it’s really easy to symbolically act as if we’re doing something to move the needle,” Ronen said. “But in actuality, not only have we not moved that needle, things are getting worse.”&nbsp;



Melgar also opposed the repeal. Like Walton, she cited concerns for small business contractors.



“There are aspects to this legislation that are valuable to people I care about, the [local business enterprise] community, small businesses,” Melgar said. “Do I think it will make things easier to administer, cheaper? Yes. But are we ready for it? I’m not quite sure.”&nbsp;



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-nonprofit-grilled-over-alleged-union-busting">Nonprofit Grilled Over Alleged Union-Busting</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="640" height="426" src="https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/UCHSPort04122023_FEATURE.gif" alt="" class="wp-image-148561"/><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The area around Pier 94 in the Bayview neighborhood houses homeless people in roughly 100 trailers and RVs. | Paul Kuroda for The Standard</figcaption></figure>



The board also held a special hearing on labor issues at the Felton Institute, a behavioral health nonprofit that has tens of millions of dollars in contracts with various city human services departments, including six programs it recently took over from the <a href="https://develop.sfstandard.com/politics/sf-blocks-contracts-homeless-nonprofit-fbi-united-council-human-services/">United Council of Human Services</a>, another organization in serious hot water with the city. 



The nonprofit has been accused of aggressive tactics against underpaid and overworked personnel looking to expand union representation, including retaliatory discipline, harassment, surveillance of workers, calling police on organizers and hiring Jackson Lewis, a law firm notorious for union-busting.&nbsp;



Managers from the Felton Institute, including Chief Operations Officer Yohana Quiróz, testified that they were limited in their capacity to answer questions due to ongoing mediation.&nbsp;



Meanwhile, Felton Institute employees and union representatives, including Service Employees International Union 1021 leader Theresa Rutherford, reiterated their complaints, with Rutherford telling the board that the nonprofit was using a “culture of disenfranchisement” against workers.&nbsp;



Understaffed programs were being forced to “ration care,” according to workers testifying at the hearing.&nbsp;



Board President Aaron Peskin commented that ongoing labor issues at the Felton Institute “had reached a critical point” and the nonprofit needed “to get its act together.”&nbsp;



“If we have another one of these hearings, there will be severe consequences,” Peskin added, while other supervisors, including Ahsha Safaí, argued for new legislation that would mandate better compliance with labor requirements in contracting.&nbsp;



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-police-drones-for-sideshows-tenderloin-chp-deployment-questioned">Police Drones for Sideshows, Tenderloin CHP Deployment Questioned</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1215" height="939" src="https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/INLINED01_Undercover21623.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-131736" srcset="https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/INLINED01_Undercover21623.jpg 1215w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/INLINED01_Undercover21623.jpg?resize=300,232 300w, https://content-develop.sfstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/INLINED01_Undercover21623.jpg?resize=768,594 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1215px) 100vw, 1215px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">People gather on the sidewalk along Hyde Street in the Tenderloin in San Francisco on Dec. 14, 2022. | Jason Henry for The Standard</figcaption></figure>



In other notable actions, supervisors addressed continued public safety issues during roll call.&nbsp;



Mandelman announced that he, along with colleagues Melgar, Safaí, Matt Dorsey and Catherine Stefani, will ask the city’s Committee on Information Technology to work with the San Francisco Police Department on a policy for deploying aerial drones against illegal sideshows.&nbsp;



“SFPD needs every tool available to make our streets safer, and this sensible policy change to allow the use of drones to identify and later impound involved vehicles will help us take back our streets,” Mandelman said in a roll call speech.&nbsp;



The move is also supported by District Attorney Brooke Jenkins, who noted in a statement that “using unmanned aerial drones to safely monitor and gather evidence against dangerous sideshow drivers is a common-sense solution that will deter this dangerous behavior and provide useful evidence that will assist in prosecution.”



According to that release, SFPD is currently limited to using drones “in n...

The Committee on Information Technology develops San Francisco's five-year strategic technology plan. It reviews and approves all new technology projects exceeding $100,000, ensuring alignment with citywide strategies. As the main governance body, it makes critical decisions on the future of San Francisco's technology landscape.

Committee on Information Technology

Carmen Chu

Michael Makstman

Nathan Sinclair

Sophia Kittler

Rafael Mandelman

Jeffrey Tumlin

Greg Wagner

Naveena Bobba

Michael Carlin

Carol Isen

Mike Nakornkhet

Julie Kirschbaum

Mawuli Tugbenyoh

Committee on Information Technology Commissioner 10

Committee on Information Technology Commissioner 14

Asian Art Museum

Office of the City Administrator

Adult Probation Department

Airport

Arts Commission

Office of the Assessor-Recorder

Board of Appeals

Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

Office of the City Attorney

Department of Children, Youth and Their Families

Controller's Office

Planning Department

Civil Service Commission

District Attorney's Office

Department of Building Inspection

Department of Early Childhood

Department of Emergency Management

Department of Police Accountability

Department of Public Health

Department of Public Works

Office of Economic and Workforce Development

Environment Department

Ethics Commission

Fine Arts Museums

Fire Department

Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing

Human Rights Commission

Department of Human Resources

Human Services Agency

Health Service System

Juvenile Probation Department

Public Library

Municipal Transportation Agency

Office of the Mayor

Public Defender's Office

Police Department

Port

Public Utilities Commission

Recreation and Park Department

Department of Elections

Retirement System

Rent Board

Sheriff's Department Office of Inspector General

Sheriff's Department

Department of Technology

Office of the Treasurer & Tax Collector

War Memorial

Department on the Status of Women

General City Responsibilities

General Administration & Finance

Culture & Recreation

Community Health

Human Welfare & Neighborhood Development

Public Works, Transportation & Commerce

Public Protection

SF Civil Grand Jury

The Abatement Appeals Board provides a final review process for City permitting decisions. It ensures fair and efficient adjudication of permit-related disputes before an impartial panel. The board holds authority to make binding decisions on appeals concerning notices of abatement.

Abatement Appeals Board

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 1

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 2

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 3

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 4

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 5

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 6

Abatement Appeals Board Commissioner 7

The Access Appeals Commission provides final reviews for a wide range of City permitting decisions. It ensures an efficient, fair, and expeditious permit issuance process through an impartial panel. The commission holds authority to make binding decisions on appeals related to City permits.

Access Appeals Commission

Access Appeals Commission Commissioner 1

Access Appeals Commission Commissioner 2

Access Appeals Commission Commissioner 3

Access Appeals Commission Commissioner 4

Access Appeals Commission Commissioner 5

The Adult Day Health Care Planning Council advises on the development and improvement of adult day health care services. It provides expertise in healthcare planning, policy recommendations, and program evaluation. Key responsibilities include assessing community needs and advising on service delivery enhancements.

Adult Day Health Care Planning Council

Adult Probation Department supervises individuals on probation and facilitates their reintegration into the community. It provides reentry and rehabilitative services, including victim restitution and financial assistance for crime victims. The department values public safety, offender rehabilitation, and community partnerships.

Cristel Tullock

The Advisory Committee of Street Artists and Crafts Examiners evaluates arts and crafts applicants and monitors program compliance. It conducts studio visits and public screenings to ensure adherence to established criteria. Members also revise program criteria and undertake additional tasks as needed.

Advisory Committee of Street Artists and Crafts Examiners

The Advisory Council on Human Rights advises on anti-discrimination laws and racial equity initiatives. It provides expertise on reparations and public policy impacts on Black communities. It guides efforts to establish partnerships with Historically Black Colleges and Universities in San Francisco.

Advisory Council on Human Rights

San Francisco Airport manages air traffic operations and ensures safe aircraft movement. It provides parking facilities and maintains airport infrastructure to accommodate travelers and staff. The department oversees ground transportation and coordinates with airlines for efficient passenger services.

The Airport Commission oversees policy and strategic planning for San Francisco International Airport. It makes key decisions on airport development projects and financial management. It ensures compliance with regulations and collaborates on initiatives like terminal naming.

Airport Commission

Airport Commission Commissioner 1

Malcolm Yeung

Jose F. Almanza

Mark Buell

Susan Leal

Airport Director

Animal Care and Control Department manages animal sheltering, adoption, and emergency response services. It enforces animal-related laws and regulations, ensuring the humane treatment and safety of animals. The department also provides public education on responsible pet ownership and animal welfare.

Animal Care and Control Department

Virginia Donohue

Animal Care and Control Department, Director

The San Francisco Arts Commission oversees the integration of arts into city life and ensures public access to cultural experiences. It makes decisions on public art programs and allocates grants to support local artists and performances. The commission actively shapes policies affecting the arts ecosystem in San Francisco.

Arts Commission Commissioner 1

Arts Commission Commissioner 2

Arts Commission Commissioner 3

Arts Commission Commissioner 4

Debra Walker

Suzanne Ferras

Jessica Rothschild

Seth Brenzel

JD Beltran

Marcus Shelby

J Riccardo Benavides

Nabiel Musleh

Charles (Chuck) Collins

Lydia So

Arts Commission Commissioner 15

San Francisco Arts Commission invests in a vibrant arts community and shapes cultural policy. It enlivens the urban environment through public art programs and supports diverse artistic expressions. The commission facilitates meetings and discussions to engage the community in cultural development.

Ralph Remington

Arts Commission, Director of Cultural Affairs

The Asian Art Commission determines policy and administers the Asian Art Museum of San Francisco. It oversees museum operations and collaborates with the Asian Art Museum Foundation on fundraising efforts. Commissioners ensure the museum's strategic direction and financial sustainability.

Asian Art Commission

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 1

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 2

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 3

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 4

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 5

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 6

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 7

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 8

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 9

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 10

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 11

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 12

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 13

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 14

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 15

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 16

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 17

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 18

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 19

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 20

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 21

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 22

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 23

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 24

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 25

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 26

Asian Art Commission Commissioner 27

Asian Art Museum showcases Asian art and culture through exhibitions and educational programs. It offers diverse collections and hosts special events to engage the community. The museum fosters cultural appreciation and understanding by providing access to its extensive art collections.

Dr. Soyoung Lee

Asian Art Museum, Director

The Assessment Appeals Board #1 hears property tax assessment appeals in San Francisco. It evaluates evidence presented by taxpayers and the Assessor to determine property values. The Board has the authority to make final decisions on assessments regardless of property type or value.

Assessment Appeals Board #1

Assessment Appeals Board #1 Commissioner 1

Assessment Appeals Board #1 Commissioner 2

Richard Lee

Stephen Wasserman

Adena Gilbert

Paul Bellar

Quirina Mitchell

Hilary Winslow

The Assessment Appeals Board #2 adjudicates property tax assessment appeals for San Francisco taxpayers. It evaluates evidence presented by taxpayers and the Assessor to determine accurate property values. The Board exercises authority to render final decisions on residential properties and specific real estate assessments.

Assessment Appeals Board #2

Assessment Appeals Board #2 Commissioner 1

Assessment Appeals Board #2 Commissioner 2

Assessment Appeals Board #2 Commissioner 3

Claire Ervin Lee

Louisa Mendoza

Joyce Lewis

Nicholas Goldman

Michelle Domingo

The Assessment Appeals Board #3 provides a platform for San Francisco taxpayers to contest property tax assessments. It conducts hearings where evidence from both taxpayers and the Assessor is evaluated. The Board makes binding decisions on property assessments based on presented evidence.

Assessment Appeals Board #3

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 1

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 2

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 3

Marc Dickow

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 5

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 6

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 7

Assessment Appeals Board #3 Commissioner 8

Assesses property, applies exemptions, collects transfer taxes, and records official documents.

Assessor-Recorder

Joaquín Torres

The Ballot Simplification Committee ensures voter materials are clear and understandable. It reviews and revises ballot language to accurately reflect propositions and measures. The committee advises on simplifying complex legal and technical terms for voter comprehension.

Ballot Simplification Committee

The Bayview Hunters Point Citizens Advisory Committee provides policy advice on planning and land use matters in Zone 2 of Bayview Hunter's Point. It offers expertise in land use policies, zoning issues, and urban development. The committee advises the Board of Supervisors, City Boards, and commissions on relevant projects and initiatives.

Bayview Hunters Point Citizens Advisory Committee

The Behavioral Health Commission advises on mental health policy implementation and quality service delivery. It reviews and advocates for effective mental health services, ensuring policies meet community needs. It educates stakeholders to integrate mental health considerations into broader health strategies.

Behavioral Health Commission